What Happens When You Put A Sony 18-135 Aps-c Lens On A Sony Full Frame Camera

Sony's latest mirrorless cameras are known for their compact size and impressive image quality. Many are offered with kit lenses like the xvi-50mm, which is a fine option for getting started. However, the E-mount lenses below offer superior optical performance and produce better images and videos, no affair whether you're an amateur photographer or seasoned veteran. Keep in mind that Sony E-mount lenses accept a crop factor of 1.5x, and you'll often run into the states list the 35mm equivalent for reference. For more than background information, see our Sony East-Mount lens comparison tabular array and buying advice below the picks.

1. Sony 35mm f/i.8 OSS ($423)

Category: Travel/portrait
35mm equivalent: 52.5mm
Weight: v.5 oz.
What we like: The leading 50mm equivalent for E-Mountain.
What nosotros don't: Expensive for a prime lens.

Everyone who shoots portraits needs a quality 50mm lens, and the Sony 35mm f/1.8 is just that (or very close to it with a 52.5mm equivalent). This prime lens is sharp, performs well in low light, and has OSS image stabilization. In addition, its sub-6-ounce weight makes it one of the lightest options on the list. Yes, y'all tin go cheaper with the Sigma 30mm f/one.4 below, only nosotros capeesh the faster autofocus, lower weight, and smaller size of the Sony, which is why we have it ranked here.

What are the downsides of the Sony 35mm f/1.8? The most notable is cost: at around $425, it'southward decently expensive for a prime lens of the APS-C diversity (as nosotros mentioned above, you can go cheaper with 3rd-party options from brands like Sigma). Second, the zoom lenses below are more versatile, although you practice cede sharpness and low-low-cal performance. Last, if you really want the best in image quality at this focal length, the Zeiss Touit 32mm f/i.8 is tough to beat, but that comes with a big jump in price to over $700.
Run into the Sony 35mm f/ane.8

two. Sony xviii-105mm f/4 G OSS ($598)

Category: Travel/portrait
35mm equivalent: 27-158mm
Weight: 15.one oz.
What we similar: A great combination of price, performance, and versatility.
What nosotros don't: Heavier than the 18-135mm below.

In that location are a number of viable travel zooms for Sony APS-C mirrorless cameras, but we think the 18-105mm f/4 offers the best combination of price and functioning. For around $600, this lens is precipitous, focuses reasonably well, and has the same f/4 maximum discontinuity and OSS image stabilization as the pricier 16-70mm f/4 below. Nosotros also similar the additional reach at 158mm vs. 105mm, although you do sacrifice a handy 3mm at the wide cease.

Ane major shortcoming of the Sony xviii-105mm f/4 G is weight: 15.ane ounces makes it one of the heaviest models on the list behind simply the 18-200mm and 16-55mm. It also can struggle with border sharpness across some apertures, although that is fairly normal for a lens of this type. In terms of other options in this category, we also similar the Sony 16-70mm f/4, which is pricier but adds Zeiss glass to the mix. And the Sony eighteen-135mm has more reach and is lighter, albeit with junior low-light performance at the telephoto terminate.
See the Sony 18-105mm f/4

3. Sony 10-18mm f/four OSS ($798)

Category: Wide bending
35mm equivalent: 15-27mm
Weight: eight oz.
What we like: Lightweight and abrupt.
What nosotros don't: Wide-angle primes offering better low-light functioning.

For landscape photographers looking for the versatility of a wide-angle zoom, the Sony 10-18mm f/four is the leading option. This lens is sharp, has minimal distortion, focuses quickly, and weighs a reasonable eight ounces—that'south considerably lighter than comparable broad-angle options for digital SLRs. Pair this lens with a camera like the a6600, and you have one heckuva set-up for outdoor photography.

Why isn't the Sony ten-18mm f/4 ranked college? Nosotros don't love the maximum aperture of f/4 for a premium lens, only it does have OSS image stabilization to help in low light. And information technology is rather pricey at effectually $800, although wide-angle zooms are an expensive bunch in general, so this isn't out of the ordinary. If you're interested in going with a prime lens, the Zeiss Touit 12mm f/2.8 below has a faster maximum aperture but is heavier and more expensive than the Sony. And toward the budget end of the spectrum, the Sigma 16mm f/1.4 is ultra-fast and a great value at less than $400, but also heavy and non besides built.
Come across the Sony 10-18mm f/4

4. Sigma 30mm f/one.4 ($279)

Category: Travel/portrait
35mm equivalent: 45mm
Weight: ix.iii oz.
What we like: A tremendous value.
What we don't: Autofocus tin be deadening.

Third-party lens manufacturer Sigma has made a big button in the Sony East-Mount lens world, which is evident with options like the 30mm f/1.4. On newspaper, this lens jumps off the page: information technology has a blazing fast f/ane.iv maximum discontinuity, a useful focal length equivalent of 45mm, and is offered for a reasonable $279. In terms of eyes, this lens can go head-to-head with models twice its price or more. All in all, it's a very solid portrait and travel lens that doesn't experience likewise beefy on pocket-size APS-C camera bodies.

Realistically, there are some sacrifices that come with the Sigma 30mm f/1.4. The autofocus isn't equally fast as we'd similar, which can make it a challenging lens for activity and video, and the build quality is subpar compared to Sony's high-end native options. Further, the Sigma lacks internal stabilization, but we don't find that to exist a huge drawback since it tin open to f/1.four. Overall, we similar the paradigm quality for the price, which is why the 30mm f/1.four is our favorite Sigma lens for Sony Due east-Mount.
See the Sigma 30mm f/1.iv

5. Sony Vario-Tessar T* E 16-70mm f/4 OSS ($898)

Category: Travel/portrait
35mm equivalent: 24-105mm
Weight: 10.ix oz.
What nosotros similar: Extremely versatile and slap-up image quality overall.
What we don't: More than the price of nigh Sony cameras.

For those who can beget it, the Sony 16-70mm f/4 is 1 of our favorite zoom lenses for Sony APS-C mirrorless cameras. It gives you superb sharpness and image quality from an equivalent of 24-105mm, which covers everything from landscapes to portraits (it's a terrific pick for travel too). The long name is a event of Sony'due south partnership with Zeiss, which is most obvious in the T* blanket that results in first-class clarity and colour. Compared to any of the kit zooms, this lens volition blow them out of the h2o.

The virtually obvious drawback of the Sony 16-70mm f/4 is cost. At most $900, information technology's i of the nigh expensive lenses on this list of any blazon. In addition, there can be some softness when shooting at the extreme ends of the zoom range, but the lens is tack sharp betwixt near 35 and 50mm. If cost is a major concern, the Sony 18-105mm to a higher place offers more range for $300 less, but we remember the 16-70mm is superior from an optical perspective.
See the Sony 16-70mm f/4

6. Sony 55-210mm f/4.5-vi.three OSS ($348)

Category: Telephoto
35mm equivalent: 82.5-315mm
Weight: 12.2 oz.
What nosotros similar: Lightweight for a telephoto zoom.
What we don't: Marginal optics and lots of plastic in the build.

There aren't all that many E-mountain lens choices at the telephoto stop of the spectrum, merely the wallet-friendly 55-210mm model has the farthest achieve with an equivalent of 315mm (second is the xviii-200mm below with an equivalent of 300mm). All in all, you get decent optics, a depression weight for a lens of this type at 12.2 ounces, and a reasonable toll. Continue in heed that the 55-210mm OSS is available in many of Sony'south mirrorless camera kits, or y'all tin can buy it on its ain for around $350 (information technology's a much better value every bit part of a kit).

Keep your expectations tempered with a lens like the Sony 55-210mm. You get what yous pay for hither: low-light operation is mediocre at f/4.5-six.3, and there is noticeable falloff in sharpness (particularly at the telephoto stop). Terminal but non least, this lens is built more often than not of plastic (the mount is metal), which helps keep weight downward but has an impact on durability in the long run. Perhaps nosotros will see a faster Eastward-mount telephoto lens down the route, but until then, the 55-210mm is a toll-constructive way to complete your kit.
See the Sony 55-210mm f/4.v-vi.three

7. Sigma 16mm f/i.iv ($390)

Category: Wide angle
35mm equivalent: 24mm
Weight: 14.3 oz.
What we similar: Super precipitous and strong in low light.
What we don't: Heavy and autofocus can exist noisy.

Once again, at that place is a lot to like about the 16mm f/1.4 from tertiary-party manufacturer Sigma. This wide-bending prime is extremely impressive in terms of sharpness and low-lite performance, beating out the Sony 16mm f/2.viii by a wide margin. With a focal length equivalent of 24mm, information technology's a nice option for landscapes, and you merely won't beat the low-light capabilities with any comparable prime or zoom lens for Sony E Mountain.

Information technology's worth noting that we like this lens better for still photography than video. The autofocus motor has a tendency to exist noisy, not to mention Sigma lenses often are slower to focus than their native counterparts. In addition, the weight of xiv.3 ounces is very heavy for a prime lens—every other wide-angle option on this listing is lighter, which makes a difference for those carrying their camera for extended periods of time. That said, you lot'll be hard-pressed to beat the paradigm quality and value of the Sigma 16mm f/1.4, which is why it's included hither.
See the Sigma 16mm f/1.4

eight. Sony 18-200mm f/3.5-half-dozen.three OSS ($748)

Category: All-in-1
35mm equivalent: 27-300mm
Weight: xvi.3 oz.
What we similar: All-in-ane lenses offer maximum versatility.
What we don't: Feels bulky on Sony'southward smaller E-mount cameras.

We understand the draw to all-in-one lenses. Instead of ownership and carrying multiple zooms or primes, one lens covers everything from wide angle to telephoto. They aren't, yet, the best from an image quality perspective and lag backside purpose-built lenses at their respective focal lengths. The Sony eighteen-200mm does capture sharp images, comes with OSS for when natural light is low, and is faster than the 55-210mm above. Near importantly, y'all tin can throw information technology on your camera and never demand to modify drinking glass.

However, we still favor going in a different direction, and particularly when yous gene in the size and weight of the Sony xviii-200mm at 16.iii ounces. Mirrorless cameras are supposed to feel small, which is hard to achieve with a lens of this size attached. Furthermore, you get expert paradigm quality throughout much of the range here, simply the lens isn't bully at any detail focal length, which is why we generally favor going with more than targeted zooms or primes.
See the Sony eighteen-200mm f/3.5-6.3

9. Sony 50mm f/ane.8 OSS ($298)

Category: Portrait
35mm equivalent: 75mm
Weight: 7.2 oz.
What nosotros like: Reasonable price point.
What we don't: Autofocus can exist noisy and hunt on occasion.

Don't be fooled past the 50mm designation: this lens is equivalent to 75mm on a 35mm camera, making information technology platonic for portraits. That said, the Sony 50mm f/1.viii is a solid lens that is sharp all the way to the corners, strong in low light with a maximum aperture of f/1.viii, and comes with image stabilization. It'south a great option for people photos and 1 of the best values of whatsoever Sony E-mount prime. You can fifty-fifty use it for macro photography—the lens isn't congenital for that purpose, but its minimum focusing distance of just over a human foot makes information technology a viable macro option.

Where does the Sony 50mm f/1.viii fall short? 75mm can exist a bit limiting, and much more than and so than a true cracking fifty. You'll as well observe that the autofocus has a tendency to chase, making it a challenging choice for activity photography and fast-moving objects. Last, the internal focus motor is fairly noisy, which isn't great news for video shooters. But for an affordably priced portrait lens for still photography, the Sony 50mm f/one.viii is a prissy choice.
See the Sony 50mm f/one.eight

ten. Sony 20mm f/ii.8 ($298)

Category: Street
35mm equivalent: 30mm
Weight: two.4 oz.
What we similar: A depression-profile, pancake-style lens.
What we don't: Lacks the typical sharpness of primes.

Mirrorless cameras are smaller and less bulky than their DSLR counterparts, and so many people try to find a lens to match. You won't do much better in this category than the 20mm f/2.8: this pancake-style lens is incredibly lightweight at only 2.4 ounces and has such a low profile that you lot'll barely notice it on your camera. Throw in a decently fast maximum discontinuity of f/2.8 and focal length equivalent of 30mm, and it makes for a fun walk-effectually lens for travel and street photography.

Things start to get dicier when you lot evaluate the optical functioning. The Sony 20mm f/2.eight lacks the sharpness and overall image quality that nosotros like to encounter from primes, and you can expect some vignetting to kick. Overall, this isn't a bad lens in terms of epitome quality, merely the lenses above certainly beat it out. That said, it's difficult to knock the low weight and tiny class factor, which is why most people purchase the 20mm f/2.8 in the outset place.
Come across the Sony 20mm f/2.eight

11. Sony 18-135mm f/3.five-five.6 OSS ($548)

Category: All-in-1
35mm equivalent: 27-202.5mm
Weight: xi.five oz.
What we like: A versatile and relatively lightweight option.
What we don't: Variable maximum discontinuity.

To further demonstrate just how popular the all-in-1 lens trend is, final year Sony released the 18-135mm to complement the existing eighteen-105mm f/4 and xviii-200mm f/three.5-5.vi. In terms of performance, nosotros are impressed for the almost part: the lens is decently sharp, lightweight for a zoom with this wide of focal length coverage, and comes with OSS image stabilization. At the end of the day, information technology's lighter than both the Sony xviii-200mm or eighteen-105mm and feels a bit more than modern.

It'due south a shut telephone call between the Sony eighteen-135mm f/3.five-5.6 and Sony 18-105mm f/four above. At the terminate of the twenty-four hours, we appreciate the stock-still maximum aperture of the latter and better performance at the long terminate, not to mention the additional focal length coverage of the xviii-135mm isn't all that helpful—-neither lens is a true telephoto. At the end of the day, both are viable do-everything lenses that rarely need to come off your Sony photographic camera, and that convenience can exist worth it for travel and everyday employ.
Encounter the Sony 18-135mm f/3.v-5.half-dozen

iv Sony E-Mount Lenses That Simply Missed the Cutting

12. Zeiss Touit 12mm f/2.eight ($849)

Category: Broad angle
35mm equivalent: 18mm
Weight: nine.2 oz.
What we similar: Edge-to-edge sharpness.
What we don't: Very pricey for a prime lens.

With a focal length equivalent of 18mm, the Zeiss Touit 12mm is for serious wide-bending photographers. For those who don't know, Zeiss makes some of the premier glass on the planet both for consumer and industrial utilise, and the company's lenses are extremely pop amid enthusiasts. The Zeiss Touit 12mm f/2.8 offers better depression-light performance than the Sony 10-18mm f/iv higher up by a full stop, excellent sharpness, minimal distortion, and superb color rendition. All told, you'd exist hard-pressed to discover a better wide-angle lens.

There are a couple of important considerations in choosing the Zeiss Touit 12mm. First, 18mm is fairly wide, so if you're non a wide-angle specialist, information technology may brand more than sense to get with a zoom lens that is more versatile (for more info on this, check out our article on Lenses and Focal Lengths for Landscapes). 2nd, the Zeiss manages to be heavier than the Sony 10-18mm f/4—often information technology's the other style around with primes. Merely if you're a dedicated mural, architecture, or astro photographer, this lens won't disappoint.
See the Zeiss Touit 12mm f/2.8

13. Sony xvi-55mm f/2.8 G ($1,398)

Category: Travel/portrait
35mm equivalent: 24-82.5mm
Weight: 17.iv oz.
What we like: A premium workhorse lens for Due east-Mount.
What nosotros don't: Pricey, heavy, and no OSS.

Hither's a fun i: if y'all're looking for pro-grade glass for your new a6600 or a6500, this year Sony released the 16-55mm f/ii.8 G. Information technology's non a perfect match, but this lens is designed to replicate the 24-70mm f/2.8 that is so popular on full-frame cameras. The result is a practise-everything workhorse lens with a fast maximum discontinuity that can create the shallow depth of field and creamy bokeh that serious photographers honey. For the best image quality from a zoom lens, this is the top option for Sony East-Mount.

Despite beingness a noticeable pace upwards in operation from a lens like the Sony xvi-70mm f/four above, we have a hard time getting over the toll. Well-nigh $1,400 is a lot to spend for an APS-C lens, not to mention the 17.four-ounce weight volition make your compact mirrorless camera first to feel rather large. On the flip side, it's noticeably lighter and cheaper than the alternative for Sony full-frame cameras, the hefty 31.3-ounce 24-70mm f/ii.8 GM with an Fe-Mountain.
Run across the Sony sixteen-55mm f/2.8 Grand

14. Sony 24mm f/1.viii Zeiss Sonnar ($998)

Category: Street/travel
35mm equivalent: 36mm
Weight: 8 oz.
What we similar: Exceptional image quality.
What we don't: Ultra-expensive and no epitome stabilization.

The Sony Vario-Tessar 16-70mm higher up may be more than versatile, but if you want summit-notch image quality at a 35mm equivalent focal length, the 24mm f/1.8 Zeiss Sonnar is 1 of the best Due east-mountain lenses on the market. It's tack sharp, great in low calorie-free, focuses quickly, and produces impressive bokeh. Plus, you're getting the premier focal length for street and travel photography, which is where much of the following for this lens comes from.

However, the reality is that many Sony APS-C photographers are priced out of buying a $one,000-ish prime lens. No matter how good the optical quality is, 35mm truly has to exist your focal length of pick to merit the high cost. That said, nosotros love the image and build quality—the Sony 24mm f/1.8 has a professional person feel and performance that are tough to friction match.
See the Sony 24mm f/1.8

15. Rokinon 12mm f/ii ($229)

Category: Broad angle
35mm equivalent: 18mm
Weight: viii.vi oz.
What nosotros like: An inexpensive wide-angle selection.
What we don't: Manual focus isn't for anybody.

Given the rather expensive wide-bending lens options above such as the Sony 10-18mm f/4 and Zeiss 12mm f/2.eight, we like thinking outside the box with the Rokinon 12mm f/two. This manual focus lens comes in a Sony E Mountain and is reasonably priced at effectually $250. And perhaps virtually impressive is its maximum aperture of f/2, which is terrific for astrophotography and other low-light photography.

That said, the Rokinon 12mm faces a major drawback: no autofocus. While some people may not have an issue with focusing manually—and some of us fifty-fifty prefer it— information technology's non a great system for beginners. In addition, we found the transmission focus to be a bit clunky on this lens in detail, just we like the sharpness and build quality. For comparison, the Zeiss 12mm Touit has similar optics and is more than double the cost.
See the Rokinon 12mm f/two

Sony E-Mount Lens Comparison Table

Lens	Price	Category	35mm Equiv.	Weight	Aperture	OSS	Filter
Sony 35mm f/1.8 OSS	$423	Travel/portrait	52.5mm	v.5 oz.	f/1.8	Yeah	49mm
Sony xviii-105mm f/4 OSS	$598	Travel/portrait	27-158mm	15.1 oz.	f/4	Aye	72mm
Sony x-18mm f/iv OSS	$798	Wide angle	15-27mm	8 oz.	f/4	Yes	62mm
Sigma 30mm f/i.iv	$279	Travel/portrait	45mm	9.2 oz.	f/1.4	No	52mm
Sony xvi-70mm f/4 1000 OSS	$898	Travel/portrait	24-105mm	10.ix oz.	f/4	Yes	55mm
Sony 55-210mm f/4.5-six.three OSS	$348	Telephoto	82.5-315mm	12.2 oz.	f/4.five-6.3	Yeah	49mm
Sigma 16mm f/1.4	$390	Wide angle	24mm	xiv.3 oz.	f/1.4	No	67mm
Sony 18-200mm f/iii.5-half dozen.three OSS	$748	All-in-i	27-300mm	16.3 oz.	f/3.v-6.3	Yes	62mm
Sony 50mm f/1.viii OSS	$348	Portrait	75mm	7.2 oz.	f/1.8	Yeah	49mm
Sony 20mm f/two.8	$298	Street	30mm	2.4 oz.	f/ii.8	No	49mm
Sony 18-135mm f/3.five-five.6 OSS	$548	All-in-one	27-202.5mm	11.5 oz.	f/3.5-5.6	Yeah	55mm
Zeiss Touit 12mm f/two.eight	$849	Wide angle	18mm	ix.2 oz.	f/2.8	No	67mm
Sony 16-55mm f/2.8 G	$1,398	Travel/portrait	24-82.5mm	17.4 oz.	f/2.eight	No	82mm
Sony 24mm f/1.8	$998	Street/travel	36mm	8 oz.	f/1.8	No	49mm
Rokinon 12mm f/two	$229	Broad angle	18mm	viii.6 oz.	f/ii	No	67mm

Sony Eastward-Mount Lens Buying Advice

• Crop Factor and Focal Length Equivalent
• Maximum Aperture
• Zoom Lenses vs. Prime Lenses
• OSS Image Stabilization (OSS)
• Third-Political party Lenses
• Adapters
• E-Mount Lenses for Video
• FE-Mount Lenses on E-Mountain Cameras

Crop Cistron (1.5x) and Focal Length Equivalent

Sony APS-C mirrorless cameras have a one.5x ingather cistron, meaning that a 50mm lens will behave like a 75mm lens would on a 35mm camera. The history backside crop cistron is long, only what you need to know is that lens focal lengths are described using 35mm pic every bit the reference point. Because the image sensors on Sony APS-C mirrorless cameras are 1.v times smaller than a 35mm photographic camera, you lot multiply the listed focal length of the lens by one.5 to make up one's mind its equivalent.

If you lot are an experienced photographer or have used a full-frame photographic camera before, crop cistron can exist very helpful in choosing lenses. For instance, the Sony 10-18mm f/four broad-angle lens is equivalent to 15-27mm, which actually is much more useful than the listed range (x-18mm would be ultrawide on a 35mm photographic camera). Considering of the importance of focal length equivalent in choosing lenses, nosotros've provided it both in the product specs and our lens comparing tabular array.

Sony 10-18mm f/4 | Lenny K Photography

Maximum Aperture

Aside from focal length, maximum aperture is ane of the most important decisions you'll make when choosing a lens. In short, aperture is the size of the lens opening through which calorie-free passes, and it impacts just about everything related to image quality: bokeh, depth of field, and sharpness. Aperture is measured in f-stops, and the lower the f-terminate (f/2.viii, f/1.8, etc.), the larger the opening and the more light tin can enter. Yous can see the full f-end calibration here, and lower numbers make for more desirable (and expensive) lenses.

In terms of numbers, nosotros mostly make the professional cutoff at f/2.eight. Lenses with this maximum aperture or faster are solid low light performers and can achieve the creamy bokeh that serious photographers dear. Primes are the fastest blazon of lens, reaching f/1.4, while some cheap zoom lenses have a maximum discontinuity of f/iv or slower. Information technology'southward worth noting that some of Sony'south latest APS-C mirrorless cameras like the Blastoff a6600 have built-in paradigm stabilization, so camera shake volition exist less prevalent than with older models.

Zoom Lenses vs. Prime Lenses

One of the bigger decisions you'll make is whether to choose a zoom or prime lens. In general, zoom lenses are more versatile past roofing a range of focal lengths, while primes often are superior optically with faster maximum apertures and less distortion. In addition, primes often are smaller, although that's not always the case and y'all may need to carry multiple lenses to cover your desired focal lengths. There are no hard-and-fast rules and there are bully options in both categories, simply zoom lenses are corking for beginners and situations like travel that require a variety of focal lengths. On the other hand, many street, portrait, and macro lenses are primes. Nosotros recommend that yous first determine which type of lens and focal length you lot want, so counterbalance the options in that category.

Sony 55-210mm f/4.5-6.3 | naql

OSS Image Stabilization (OSS)

Many of Sony'south Due east-mount lenses have born Optical SteadyShot (OSS) image stabilization (you'll notice the OSS moniker at the end of the lens name). This technology is similar to Nikon's Vibration Reduction (VR) and Canon's Image Stabilization (IS) in that the lens itself helps to offset camera shake in subpar lighting atmospheric condition. Essentially, a floating chemical element in the lens shifts co-ordinate to movements, which tin be peculiarly helpful when using bulky telephoto lenses. This differs from in-camera image stabilization, which occurs when the sensor itself undergoes a similar procedure. The Sony a6600 and a6500 currently are the only Sony East-mount cameras to offer in-camera epitome stabilization (information technology'southward likewise available on Sony'due south full-frame a7 serial).

OSS epitome stabilization is useful in that information technology tin help make certain catchy hand-held photos in low light possible. With faster lenses that take maximum apertures of f/2.eight or amend, OSS isn't a major priority since you tin typically eliminate milkshake past opening the aperture to crash-land up shutter speed. If you're wanting more than depth of field, a tripod is the more surefire solution, but OSS definitely is an upside to whatsoever lens, and especially heavy models with long zoom ranges.

3rd-Political party Lenses

Many of our lens articles have prominent representation from third-party manufacturers, and Sony E Mount is no exception. Sigma in detail has made a big push to capture market share for this pop lens mount, and in this article we've included two models: the Sigma 30mm f/1.4 and 16mm f/1.iv. In addition, the Sony/Zeiss marriage is somewhat unique in the world of photography and has been going on for years. A number of E-mount lenses are co-branded (called "Sony/Zeiss"), and Zeiss has created three of its own lenses for Sony E-Mount cameras ("Touit"). Considering of Zeiss' stellar reputation in optics, these are highly regarded lenses that can go caput-to-head with merely about anything on the market place in terms of quality, and often have a price tag to match. When buying lenses for your mirrorless camera, keep a close eye on the title and the blueish Zeiss logo on the barrel. Lenses with both "Sony" and "Zeiss" in the championship are co-branded, while "Touit" lenses are exclusively Zeiss.

Sigma 30mm f/1.iv | Adam Court

Adapters

The number of Sony Due east-mountain lens choices is express compared to Nikon'south DX or Canon's EF-S collections. Accordingly, some people utilise an adapter for lenses they already own or even wish to buy. At that place is a range of adapters to cull from, including budget models that don't connect well to the photographic camera's autofocus to pricier models that perform much closer to a native lens. As an example, for Canon EF-S to Sony E-mount, the Metabones Smart Adapter allows yous to use your existing lenses with full functionality (or shut to it). The much less expensive Fotodiox Lens Adapter works on Sony Due east-mount cameras simply you can expect autofocus to exist noticeably slower. Video and action shooters should beware when using cheap adapters as the autofocus speed likely volition disappoint.

Given the price and technical challenges of adapters, we tend to retrieve of them more for full-frame cameras than APS-C cameras. Outset, the cost of the adapter is significant relative to the cost of the lenses (the Metabones adapter currently is $399, for case). And the weight and bulk of many DSLR lenses will exist noticeable on Sony'due south relatively meaty mirrorless camera lineup. Grab an adapter if you lot absolutely need it, but we prefer going with Sony's native lenses or third-party models with Due east mounts. And the good news is that in 2019, in that location are aplenty options to choose from that don't crave an adapter.

East-Mount Lenses for Video

Many cameras, similar Sony's Blastoff a6600, at present come with impressive video capabilities. These petty bodies can pack a dial with the ability to shoot in 4K at 30fps and 1080p at 120fps with internal stabilization. Although we didn't focus as well much on video in a higher place since information technology's not a priority for most shooters, many of the lenses on our list are cracking choices for those looking for a solid video set-up.

For case, Sony's 10-18mm and 18-105mm both offer OSS, which is fifty-fifty more than impressive when paired with the internal stabilization of a camera like the a6600. The 10-18mm in detail is a nice selection for its low weight (viii ounces) if you lot're planning to utilise a hand-held gimbal. That said, the 18-105mm is a much more versatile lens for the added range. And for those interested in a simple yet powerful set-up, nosotros'd recommend giving the Sigma 30mm f/1.4 a try. The 45mm equivalent is a peachy focal length, and although the lens doesn't have OSS, in-camera stabilization could assistance make up for it.

FE-Mount (Full Frame) Lenses on Due east-Mountain Cameras

Sony makes a number of Iron-mount (full frame) lenses for its a7 serial cameras. Are these lenses compatible on E-mountain cameras without an adapter? The curt answer is yeah. However, FE lenses are quite expensive and beyond the cost range of many people who buy APS-C cameras. In add-on, FE-mountain lenses generally are heavier and bulkier than E-mountain lenses, which you'll find even more on meaty and lightweight cameras similar the a6500 and a6300. On total-frame cameras like the a7R IV, Sony actually reinforced the lens mountain, and those cameras were much larger to brainstorm with.
Back to Our Sony E-Mount Lens Picks  Back to Our E-Mount Lens Comparison Table

Source: https://www.switchbacktravel.com/11-great-sony-e-mount-lenses

Posted by: weinmanndraugh.blogspot.com

Share this post